About Me
- Kunes Law Office
- Tifton, Georgia, United States
- Joe Kunes is a Personal Injury and Criminal DUI/DWI defense Attorney in Tifton, Georgia. He has been practicing law in Tifton and the surrounding counties since 1972. He is a graduate of Tift County Schools, the University of Georgia, 1969, B.A., and University of Georgia Law School J.D., 1972. In 40 years of practice in Tifton he has handled all areas of the law, but now restricts his practice to criminal defense and personal injury work. The majority of his criminal practice relates to the defense of drinking drivers, not only in Tifton, but all over South Georgia. His personal injury practice includes representing plaintiffs injured in automobile accidents and medical malpractice cases in Tifton and surrounding counties. He is a member of Georgia Trial Lawyers Association (Vice President in 2000), American Trial Lawyers Association (sustaining member), National Association of Criminal Defense Attorneys, Georgia Association of Criminal Defense Attorneys, the National College for DUI Defense (NCDD), and the Georgia Defense of DUI Drivers (D.O.D.D.).
Wednesday, June 25, 2014
Defending DUI blog has moved!
The Defending DUI blog has been given its own separate website, DefendingDUI.com. The new blog location can be found at the link:
http://www.defendingdui.com/blog
Wednesday, June 26, 2013
National Lawyer's Guild releases report on Strategies to Further Marijuana Legalization Initiatives
http://www.nlg.org/news/releases/wake-new-marijuana-laws-nlg-report-contrasts-legalization-strategies-and-obstacles
In November 2012, Washington and Colorado became the first states—and the first jurisdictions in the world—to legalize the possession, use, and regulated distribution of marijuana.
Although Attorney General Eric Holder promised in March 2013 to announce a Department of Justice policy to address the state initiatives, the White House has yet to take a position. This shifting legal terrain is the subject of “High Crimes: Strategies to Further Marijuana Legalization Initiatives,” a new report by the National Lawyers Guild (NLG).
The NLG report analyzes the legalization process under way in the states, suggests strategies to further marijuana legalization initiatives, and highlights current obstacles to ending prohibition. Among the NLG recommendations: reframe drug use as a public health issue rather than a criminal justice problem, challenge the punitive international drug policy framework, support states’ rights to regulate marijuana use, and reclassify marijuana to allow for medical research.
“High Crimes” also calls attention to the role of law enforcement agencies and private prison industry interventions in the field of US drug policy. “It is crucial to examine who profits from the continued prohibition of marijuana,” said NLG Senior Researcher Traci Yoder, the report’s author. “The increasing militarization of police forces is funded through property and financial seizures during drug arrests. Continued profit making by private corrections corporations is contingent upon ever-increasing rates of incarceration.”
As the nation waits for a response from the White House, the NLG joins other organizations and individuals in calling for the end to marijuana prohibition. “Marijuana legalization will create new jobs, generate millions of dollars in tax revenue, and allow law enforcement to focus on serious crimes,” said Brian Vicente, NLG member and one of the primary authors of Colorado’s legalization amendment. “It would be a travesty if the Obama administration used its power to impose marijuana prohibition upon a state whose people have declared, through the democratic process, that they want it to end.”
The report, “High Crimes: Strategies to Further Marijuana Legalization Initiatives,” can be accessed on the NLG website at www.nlg.org.
The National Lawyers Guild is the oldest and largest public interest/human rights bar organization in the United States. Its headquarters are in New York and it has members in every state.
Tuesday, June 4, 2013
License Plate Recognition Software being used on Georgia Roads
In May of 2013, the Georgia Court of Appeals upheld the trial court judge's ruling in Hill v State. Hill was convicted for possession of marijuana for a partially smoked marijuana cigarette found under his console. Although he had not broken any traffic laws while driving, Fayette County deputies used License Plate Recognition Software that suggested that a wanted person might be driving the vehicle. After Hill was stopped, the officer smelled an odor of burnt marijuana and discovered Hill's license had been suspended. Even though Hill was not the owner of the vehicle, and not the wanted person the system alerted to, the Court of Appeals ruled that the stop was justified and the conviction affirmed. Watch the video below for more information on License Plate Recognition Software (thanks to Bubba Head for pointing out the video to me).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eWlJoEagTmM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eWlJoEagTmM
Wednesday, January 23, 2013
Massachusetts crime lab employee used drug evidence and replaced with fake substances
Chemist
Sonja Farak stole and apparently used illegal drugs entrusted to her by
the state to test as evidence in criminal cases, replacing the drugs
with look-alike substances in an attempt to hide her actions,
authorities said in court documents.
Last
week, authorities followed a trail of evidence that took them from
Farak’s work station at the State Police-run lab in Amherst to her car,
where they recovered cocaine and heroin that had been previously
submitted by law enforcement to the lab for testing, according to the
newly released documents.
Farak,
35, parked her Volkswagen Golf outside Springfield District Court on
Friday, where she was scheduled to testify as an expert witness in an
unrelated drug case. Troopers confronted her inside that courthouse and
seized her car, which they searched, discovering the drugs and other lab
materials, the documents state.
Farak
was arraigned in Eastern Hampshire District Court on Tuesday and
charged with two counts each of withholding evidence and drug
possession. Her attorney, Elaine Pourinski, pleaded not guilty on her
behalf.
Pourinski
told Judge John Payne that Farak does not have a criminal record and is
regarded as an upstanding citizen in her neighborhood in Northampton.
Two hours after the arraignment, Farak’s parents posted $5,000 cash
bail.
With
an unprecedented drug lab scandal already revolving around Annie
Dookhan, the chemist who allegedly tampered with hundreds of evidence
samples at the Hinton lab in Jamaica Plain, leading to the release of
almost 200 defendants, Farak’s alleged wrongdoings further tarnish a
system critically important to prosecutors.
So
far there is evidence suggesting that Farak allegedly corrupted only
two cases, but an investigation by State Police is ongoing. That
investigation may lead authorities back to Boston and the Hinton lab,
where both chemists worked in 2003 and 2004.
Though
Farak spent most of her career in Amherst, she analyzed more than
11,000 drug samples from Boston cases, according to records from the
Jamaica Plain lab. As a result, questions about the integrity of her
work could have an impact in Boston.
While
working at the Jamaica Plain lab, records show Farak analyzed more than
9,000 samples, frequently producing more test results per month than
Dookhan, who is now facing criminal indictment for allegedly falsifying
test results. After Farak was transferred to Amherst in 2004, she still
analyzed drug evidence from nearly 2,000 Boston cases, according to the
records.
The
Hinton lab, which had been run by the state’s Department of Health, was
shut down early last year by Governor Deval Patrick after the
allegations against Dookhan surfaced. The task of analyzing drug samples
was transferred to State Police labs.
Curtis
Wood, undersecretary of forensic science and technology for the
executive office of public safety and security, said Tuesday that the
Amherst lab, which handles 3,000 cases a year, has been shut down and
the chemists and case load have been sent to a Sudbury lab.
Patrick
said that he, like the public, was surprised that another chemist has
been charged with a crime. “My first reaction was, you’ve got to be
kidding me,” he said.
He said that after learning more about the case, he believes it is completely different from the scandal involving Dookhan.
“The most important take-home I think is that no individual’s due process rights were compromised” in the Amherst lab, he said.
He
also rejected Republican legislation calling for more drug lab
oversight, but said he would be willing to talk with its sponsors.
In
2011, Dookhan tried to help Farak analyze a drug she had never examined
before. A supervisor, Peter Piro, asked Dookhan to assist Farak in
analyzing something called “lisdexamfetamine.”
Farak
was concerned because when she ran the sample, she said she got a “very
poor” match, Piro said, adding that she said she was “concerned that it
may not be what it is supposed to be. Only thing [evidence] on the guy
too.”
Farak’s attorney said Tuesday that the media attention that followed her client has been exacerbated by the Dookhan scandal.
“If
we didn’t have the case from the eastern part of the state, there would
not be so much scrutiny,” Pourinski said during the arraignment, as a
half-dozen cameras focused on her and Farak, sitting in a holding bin
with her hands cuffed.
Several of the defendant’s neighbors submitted statements to the court supporting Farak.
“As
a licensed clinical social worker for 28 years, I am often in the
position of vouching for an individual’s character and am happy to do so
for Ms. Farak,” said Marcie D. Cooper, who lives several houses away
from Farak on Laurel Park, a street within a condominium community.
Neighbors
talked about how Farak always took it upon herself to clear snow from
their driveways, walk their dogs while they were on vacation, and drive
incapacitated neighbors to medical appointments.
But
in the prosecutor’s statement of facts on the case, contained in the
same file as those letters, authorities say one of Farak’s coworkers
noticed something wrong with two samples last Thursday.
The
coworker was attempting to find the samples to match with the
certification Farak had completed. After she was unable to locate the
samples, the coworker alerted a supervisor. They looked in Farak’s work
station cabinet and allegedly found cocaine and a counterfeit substance.
To
protect the vital “chain-of-custody” at the lab, proper procedure
dictates that samples checked out to a chemist be stored in a temporary
evidence locker when they are away from their stations.
http://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2013/01/22/state-chemist-pleads-not-guilty-charges-tampering-with-drugs-being-tested/YaC09bhANjpi8BTjQGo74I/story.html
Wednesday, January 2, 2013
Utah Trooper who made false DUI arrests is target of class action lawsuit
State troopers put their lives on the line every day. And the act of
pulling someone over on a highway can be a deadly experience for any cop
not following the best protocols. But police are also under great
pressure to generate ticket revenue for their cities, counties and
states, and their zeal to hit revenue targets can lead them to do the
wrong thing.
So says a class action suit filed against the State of Utah and a specific state trooper who is accused of writing "driving under the influence" tickets when they weren't impaired.
State trooper Lisa Steed was honored inside the state police force for busting an extraordinary number of drunk drivers. But some of her convictions were subsequently over-turned, and the trooper was reprimanded and then fired for making false arrests.
Since Steed's performance and punishment were reported, dozens of people who were convicted have been signing up with lawyers for a class action suit. People convicted of DUI lost money, cars and trailers and even jobs, according to ABC 4 News/Salt Lake City.
One such plaintiff is Thomas Romero who was arrested by Steed in 2011. "I wasn't drunk ... I was not intoxicated. Nothing," Romero told ABC 4.
One of the representing attorneys, Robert Sykes, says he is looking at hundreds of drivers who may have been victimized. Sykes is ambitiously seeking that all DUI arrests by state troopers be over-turned in cases where the trooper was the only witness.
How much could plaintiffs get? Attorneys are hoping to get Romero, for example, at least $20,000 to cover everything he lost, including his truck and his motor home. If you add up all the cases these attorneys think are out there, the lawsuit could potentially cost Steed and the Utah Highway Patrol $20 million.
http://autos.aol.com/article/lisa-steed-utah-police-dui-lawsuit/?ncid=txtlnkusauto00000020
So says a class action suit filed against the State of Utah and a specific state trooper who is accused of writing "driving under the influence" tickets when they weren't impaired.
State trooper Lisa Steed was honored inside the state police force for busting an extraordinary number of drunk drivers. But some of her convictions were subsequently over-turned, and the trooper was reprimanded and then fired for making false arrests.
Since Steed's performance and punishment were reported, dozens of people who were convicted have been signing up with lawyers for a class action suit. People convicted of DUI lost money, cars and trailers and even jobs, according to ABC 4 News/Salt Lake City.
One such plaintiff is Thomas Romero who was arrested by Steed in 2011. "I wasn't drunk ... I was not intoxicated. Nothing," Romero told ABC 4.
One of the representing attorneys, Robert Sykes, says he is looking at hundreds of drivers who may have been victimized. Sykes is ambitiously seeking that all DUI arrests by state troopers be over-turned in cases where the trooper was the only witness.
How much could plaintiffs get? Attorneys are hoping to get Romero, for example, at least $20,000 to cover everything he lost, including his truck and his motor home. If you add up all the cases these attorneys think are out there, the lawsuit could potentially cost Steed and the Utah Highway Patrol $20 million.
http://autos.aol.com/article/lisa-steed-utah-police-dui-lawsuit/?ncid=txtlnkusauto00000020
Thursday, December 27, 2012
Audit: Georgia driver records system flawed
Georgia is at risk of losing
$30 million in federal highway funds and jeopardizing public safety
because of erroneous or incomplete information in its driver records, a
new state audit shows.
Among the problems is that dozens of courts either don’t report traffic, drug and stolen vehicle convictions to the Department of Driver Services or are slow in reporting them. As a result, dangerous drivers may be able to stay on the roads.
Georgia also allows license suspensions for DUI offenses to be wiped off of driver records, if the charge does not result in a conviction. That is contrary to federal law, which considers deleting such license suspensions as “masking.” A federal law enacted this past summer requires this issue to be resolved by 2015, auditors reported this week.“At current funding levels, approximately $30 million could be at risk,” the audit says.
Among the audit’s other findings are:
• Officials from 28 courts told state auditors they had reportable convictions that had not been forwarded to DDS. Many indicated they were unaware of the reporting requirements.
• State law requires courts to report offenses within 10 days of the conviction date. About 300,000 of the million convictions processed last year did not meet this requirement. As a result, state driver records are not up to date with convictions, points and license suspensions.
• When DDS detects errors in conviction records, it returns them to the courts for corrections. Last year, state officials identified 58,650 such records that needed corrections. As of August of this year, 53,449 had not been resolved and resubmitted.
• Auditors also were concerned DDS does not have policies about which of its employees can change or delete information on driver records. “Without sufficient access and regular monitoring, the database is vulnerable to unauthorized changes, such as personnel inactivating a conviction or license suspension from the driver records,” the audit states. Other states conduct periodic reviews of employee activities to investigate potential fraud, the report said.
• Driver records also are marred by some inaccurate addresses, missing and inaccurate case numbers for convictions and missing blood alcohol levels, used to determine the length of license suspension for first-time DUI offenders under age 21. Omissions of critical driving violations from states where Georgia drivers previously lived also hamper identification of problem drivers, the report says.
• About 9,500 “super speeder” fine notices were returned as undeliverable between 2010 and 2011. Of those motorists, about 5,700 had not paid their fines as of April of this year, causing more than $1.1 million in fees to go uncollected.
In its response, the department said it has worked the last five years to improve the validity, accuracy and completeness of driving records. For example, this summer it began requiring residents to provide proof of their mailing address, and it received a grant for a judicial liaison who worked with the courts on conviction reporting.
The department told the Georgia Department of Audits and Accounts the cost of implementing one recommendation – that critical violations in prior states be included on driver histories – would outweigh the expected benefits.
“DDS noted that there is currently no mechanism for the 50 states to exchange a non-commercial driver’s history among the state jurisdictions, so that DDS could import a new Georgia resident’s driving record from the resident’s prior state,” the report said.
DDS Commissioner Rob Mikell issued a statement Thursday, saying his agency “will continue our efforts to improve the integrity and security of our records management processes.”
“We look forward to studying the additional recommendations in-depth as we strive to better serve the citizens of Georgia,” he said.
A spokesman for Georgia House Speaker David Ralston, R-Blue Ridge, said his office is reviewing the audit and “will ask the appropriate legislative committee to review it as well in order to determine the necessary legislative action to address these findings when the General Assembly convenes in 2013.”
Gov. Nathan Deal’s office referred questions to Mikell. An aide to Lt. Gov. Casey Cagle and an official with the Georgia Municipal Court Clerks Council did not respond to requests for comment Thursday.
An official with the state Administrative Office of the Courts said his agency was not involved in the audit and “has no authority over any individual court across the state and does not have the power to compel the reporting of caseload data by the courts.”
Superior Courts handle more serious traffic offenses and drug crimes. Mike Holiman, executive director of the Council of Superior Court Clerks of Georgia, said superior courts represent a small fraction of the roughly 1,100 courts in Georgia. Superior Courts, he added, routinely report information to the Georgia Crime Information Center and state Corrections Department.
“I believe our members do report correctly,” Holiman said.
By Lois Norder/ Atlanta Journal Constitution
Among the problems is that dozens of courts either don’t report traffic, drug and stolen vehicle convictions to the Department of Driver Services or are slow in reporting them. As a result, dangerous drivers may be able to stay on the roads.
Georgia also allows license suspensions for DUI offenses to be wiped off of driver records, if the charge does not result in a conviction. That is contrary to federal law, which considers deleting such license suspensions as “masking.” A federal law enacted this past summer requires this issue to be resolved by 2015, auditors reported this week.“At current funding levels, approximately $30 million could be at risk,” the audit says.
Among the audit’s other findings are:
• Officials from 28 courts told state auditors they had reportable convictions that had not been forwarded to DDS. Many indicated they were unaware of the reporting requirements.
• State law requires courts to report offenses within 10 days of the conviction date. About 300,000 of the million convictions processed last year did not meet this requirement. As a result, state driver records are not up to date with convictions, points and license suspensions.
• When DDS detects errors in conviction records, it returns them to the courts for corrections. Last year, state officials identified 58,650 such records that needed corrections. As of August of this year, 53,449 had not been resolved and resubmitted.
• Auditors also were concerned DDS does not have policies about which of its employees can change or delete information on driver records. “Without sufficient access and regular monitoring, the database is vulnerable to unauthorized changes, such as personnel inactivating a conviction or license suspension from the driver records,” the audit states. Other states conduct periodic reviews of employee activities to investigate potential fraud, the report said.
• Driver records also are marred by some inaccurate addresses, missing and inaccurate case numbers for convictions and missing blood alcohol levels, used to determine the length of license suspension for first-time DUI offenders under age 21. Omissions of critical driving violations from states where Georgia drivers previously lived also hamper identification of problem drivers, the report says.
• About 9,500 “super speeder” fine notices were returned as undeliverable between 2010 and 2011. Of those motorists, about 5,700 had not paid their fines as of April of this year, causing more than $1.1 million in fees to go uncollected.
In its response, the department said it has worked the last five years to improve the validity, accuracy and completeness of driving records. For example, this summer it began requiring residents to provide proof of their mailing address, and it received a grant for a judicial liaison who worked with the courts on conviction reporting.
The department told the Georgia Department of Audits and Accounts the cost of implementing one recommendation – that critical violations in prior states be included on driver histories – would outweigh the expected benefits.
“DDS noted that there is currently no mechanism for the 50 states to exchange a non-commercial driver’s history among the state jurisdictions, so that DDS could import a new Georgia resident’s driving record from the resident’s prior state,” the report said.
DDS Commissioner Rob Mikell issued a statement Thursday, saying his agency “will continue our efforts to improve the integrity and security of our records management processes.”
“We look forward to studying the additional recommendations in-depth as we strive to better serve the citizens of Georgia,” he said.
A spokesman for Georgia House Speaker David Ralston, R-Blue Ridge, said his office is reviewing the audit and “will ask the appropriate legislative committee to review it as well in order to determine the necessary legislative action to address these findings when the General Assembly convenes in 2013.”
Gov. Nathan Deal’s office referred questions to Mikell. An aide to Lt. Gov. Casey Cagle and an official with the Georgia Municipal Court Clerks Council did not respond to requests for comment Thursday.
An official with the state Administrative Office of the Courts said his agency was not involved in the audit and “has no authority over any individual court across the state and does not have the power to compel the reporting of caseload data by the courts.”
Superior Courts handle more serious traffic offenses and drug crimes. Mike Holiman, executive director of the Council of Superior Court Clerks of Georgia, said superior courts represent a small fraction of the roughly 1,100 courts in Georgia. Superior Courts, he added, routinely report information to the Georgia Crime Information Center and state Corrections Department.
“I believe our members do report correctly,” Holiman said.
By Lois Norder/ Atlanta Journal Constitution
Monday, December 10, 2012
GA Rep. to Introduce Legislation to Protect Against Exploitation of Headshots for Profit
Georgia Representative Roger Bruce
has recently caught the attention of national media with talks on
introducing legislation in 2013 to protect individuals who have
headshots for police records, commonly known as “mugshots.”
These headshots are visible to the public on the sheriff’s county website and there are no guidelines on the usage of the headshots. This allows third-parties to post the headshots on a personal website and request a fee to have photograph removed.
The proposal will make it illegal to ask for money to remove the headshot from the website. It will also require the sheriff’s department to copyright all mug shots posted on their website. Including a copyright on the mug shot will remove the incentive to exploit “mugshots” for a profit. Lastly, Representative Bruce hopes this will provide victims a legal platform to rightfully have their headshots removed and sue for any damages caused by the improper use of their photo.
“When someone is arrested, your political party is not a concern. This is not about Democrats or Republicans. This is a non- partisan issue, and anyone can be victimized in this situation,” said Rep. Roger Bruce. “No one deserves to be subjected to this kind of scrutiny and abuse for money when they have not been convicted of a crime. Everyone is innocent until proven guilty.”
Rep. Roger Bruce filmed a segment with ABC explaining the importance of this proposal. His segment will air on Tuesday December 11, 2012 on World News with Diane Sawyer at 6:30PM and Nightline at 11:30PM.
http://eastatlanta.patch.com/announcements/representative-roger-bruce-will-introduce-legislationto-protect-against-exploitation-of-headshots-for-profit-94761a00
These headshots are visible to the public on the sheriff’s county website and there are no guidelines on the usage of the headshots. This allows third-parties to post the headshots on a personal website and request a fee to have photograph removed.
The proposal will make it illegal to ask for money to remove the headshot from the website. It will also require the sheriff’s department to copyright all mug shots posted on their website. Including a copyright on the mug shot will remove the incentive to exploit “mugshots” for a profit. Lastly, Representative Bruce hopes this will provide victims a legal platform to rightfully have their headshots removed and sue for any damages caused by the improper use of their photo.
“When someone is arrested, your political party is not a concern. This is not about Democrats or Republicans. This is a non- partisan issue, and anyone can be victimized in this situation,” said Rep. Roger Bruce. “No one deserves to be subjected to this kind of scrutiny and abuse for money when they have not been convicted of a crime. Everyone is innocent until proven guilty.”
Rep. Roger Bruce filmed a segment with ABC explaining the importance of this proposal. His segment will air on Tuesday December 11, 2012 on World News with Diane Sawyer at 6:30PM and Nightline at 11:30PM.
http://eastatlanta.patch.com/announcements/representative-roger-bruce-will-introduce-legislationto-protect-against-exploitation-of-headshots-for-profit-94761a00
Tuesday, November 27, 2012
McCrae Officer Arrests Man for Video Recording Him During Traffic Stop
http://www.informationliberation.com/?id=41831
A Georgia police officer arrested a citizen who was video recording him during a traffic stop last week. Andrew Ogiba, 19, was charged with obstruction or hindering law enforcement officers, by officer B. Wyatt of the McCrae Police Department. As a result, Ogiba spent two hours in jail before paying a $500 bond to be released. He had to pay an additional $150 because his 1995 Camaro had been impounded.
But now Ogiba is already planning to file a lawsuit. “I’ve already emailed the ACLU and will be talking to a lawyer tomorrow,” he said in a telephone interview with Photography is Not a Crime Sunday evening. Ogiba, who has been in the U.S. Army for two years, is worried the arrest will affect his ROTC scholarship.
The incident took place Wednesday when Ogiba was driving back home to Mcrae from Augusta after spotting two officers parked at the side of the road. Having received a citation for loud music earlier this year, he instinctively turned the music down, which he had been listening to during the three-hour drive.
As Wyatt was writing the citation from his patrol vehicle, Ogiba was narrating into the camera about how the ACLU believes noise citations are unconstitutional and how he plans to fight the citation.
At 3:42, Wyatt steps out of his vehicle and begins walking towards Ogiba’s car. Ogiba asks the officer is he had used a measuring device to determine the noise decibels from his car. Officer Wyatt ignores the question, ordering him to sign the citation, informing him that the music could be heard from 200 yards away. Ogiba signs the citation but continues to ask if a measuring device had been used to determine the distance that the music could be heard. At this point, both men are remaining civil and professional. Ogiba makes no secret that he is recording and Wyatt takes no issue with the camera. Wyatt even tells him to “have a nice day” before walking back to his car and Ogiba responds by saying, “OK, you too.”
As Wyatt was walking back to his car, Ogiba speaks into his camera, saying, “he’s going back to his car, he refused to answer any of my questions.” That caused Wyatt to stop in his tracks and turn around. “Excuse me, sir,” Wyatt says as he starts walking back. “I was talking to my camera,” Ogiba responds. “I said you refused to answer any of my questions and you can do that, that’s fine.” That was when Wyatt orders him out of the parking lot, telling him it is private property. Ogiba puts on his seat belt and places the key in his ignition, but then starts questioning whether or not the church parking lot was open to the public despite it being private. He also made the mistake of asking for the officers name. At 5:56, Wyatt opens the door to Ogiba’s car and orders him out, telling him he is being arrested for obstruction of a law enforcement officer.
A Georgia police officer arrested a citizen who was video recording him during a traffic stop last week. Andrew Ogiba, 19, was charged with obstruction or hindering law enforcement officers, by officer B. Wyatt of the McCrae Police Department. As a result, Ogiba spent two hours in jail before paying a $500 bond to be released. He had to pay an additional $150 because his 1995 Camaro had been impounded.
But now Ogiba is already planning to file a lawsuit. “I’ve already emailed the ACLU and will be talking to a lawyer tomorrow,” he said in a telephone interview with Photography is Not a Crime Sunday evening. Ogiba, who has been in the U.S. Army for two years, is worried the arrest will affect his ROTC scholarship.
The incident took place Wednesday when Ogiba was driving back home to Mcrae from Augusta after spotting two officers parked at the side of the road. Having received a citation for loud music earlier this year, he instinctively turned the music down, which he had been listening to during the three-hour drive.
As Wyatt was writing the citation from his patrol vehicle, Ogiba was narrating into the camera about how the ACLU believes noise citations are unconstitutional and how he plans to fight the citation.
At 3:42, Wyatt steps out of his vehicle and begins walking towards Ogiba’s car. Ogiba asks the officer is he had used a measuring device to determine the noise decibels from his car. Officer Wyatt ignores the question, ordering him to sign the citation, informing him that the music could be heard from 200 yards away. Ogiba signs the citation but continues to ask if a measuring device had been used to determine the distance that the music could be heard. At this point, both men are remaining civil and professional. Ogiba makes no secret that he is recording and Wyatt takes no issue with the camera. Wyatt even tells him to “have a nice day” before walking back to his car and Ogiba responds by saying, “OK, you too.”
As Wyatt was walking back to his car, Ogiba speaks into his camera, saying, “he’s going back to his car, he refused to answer any of my questions.” That caused Wyatt to stop in his tracks and turn around. “Excuse me, sir,” Wyatt says as he starts walking back. “I was talking to my camera,” Ogiba responds. “I said you refused to answer any of my questions and you can do that, that’s fine.” That was when Wyatt orders him out of the parking lot, telling him it is private property. Ogiba puts on his seat belt and places the key in his ignition, but then starts questioning whether or not the church parking lot was open to the public despite it being private. He also made the mistake of asking for the officers name. At 5:56, Wyatt opens the door to Ogiba’s car and orders him out, telling him he is being arrested for obstruction of a law enforcement officer.
Friday, September 28, 2012
South Georgia Drug Task Force to Disband
The leader of a south Georgia drug task force says it will disband by the end of this year due to a lack of funding .
South Georgia Drug Task Force Cmdr. Bahan Rich tells the Valdosta Daily Times that the unit will end on or by Dec. 31. Rich says the unit's federal funding was cut by 55 percent. He said the unit isn't dropping any of its current cases, and will have time to complete its investigations before Dec. 31 and forward information to prosecutors.
The task force was composed of officers from the Cook County Sheriff's Office, Adel Police Department, Lenox Police Department, Berrien County Sheriff's Department, Echols County Sheriff's Office, Lanier County Sheriff's Office, Clinch County Sheriff's Office, Homerville Police Department and several other regional agencies.
http://www.myfoxatlanta.com/story/19656615/south-georgia-drug-task-force-to-disband
South Georgia Drug Task Force Cmdr. Bahan Rich tells the Valdosta Daily Times that the unit will end on or by Dec. 31. Rich says the unit's federal funding was cut by 55 percent. He said the unit isn't dropping any of its current cases, and will have time to complete its investigations before Dec. 31 and forward information to prosecutors.
The task force was composed of officers from the Cook County Sheriff's Office, Adel Police Department, Lenox Police Department, Berrien County Sheriff's Department, Echols County Sheriff's Office, Lanier County Sheriff's Office, Clinch County Sheriff's Office, Homerville Police Department and several other regional agencies.
http://www.myfoxatlanta.com/story/19656615/south-georgia-drug-task-force-to-disband
Thursday, August 23, 2012
Joe Kunes is defending a farmer against civil forfeiture arising out of alleged cock-fighting ring
An alleged cock-fighting operation has put a Norman Park man
in jeopardy not only of criminal sanctions but of possibly losing more than 350
acres of land.
The Colquitt County District Attorney’s office this week filed notice of a civil action seeking to seize 356 acres of land, an ATV, weapons and $10,000 in cash taken during a July 7 raid on the property.
Wallace Hurst, 57, 4391 U.S. 319 N., was one of 32 people arrested at that time and charged with gambling. He also is charged with violating the Georgia Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, a felony, and cruelty to animals.
On Thursday, Tifton attorney Joe Kunes, who is representing Hurst, said that he was unable to comment on the legal case at this time because he is still seeking information gathered by law enforcement.
Hurst is working out of town and has not been served with notice of the attempt to seize the property, Kunes said. He likely will request a hearing on the civil motion.
“I can assure you he’ll be filing a request for that,” he said. “I haven’t seen that complaint yet.”
Hurst will have 30 days from the date he is served notice to give an answer to the complaint, Kunes said.
Any property seized would go the agency that made the legal case, he said. In a drug case, for instance, a car used in the crime can be seized and sold or put into use by the agency.
The other 29 men and two women charged with parties to animal cruelty in the case are scheduled for trial on Monday.
The Colquitt County District Attorney’s office this week filed notice of a civil action seeking to seize 356 acres of land, an ATV, weapons and $10,000 in cash taken during a July 7 raid on the property.
Wallace Hurst, 57, 4391 U.S. 319 N., was one of 32 people arrested at that time and charged with gambling. He also is charged with violating the Georgia Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, a felony, and cruelty to animals.
On Thursday, Tifton attorney Joe Kunes, who is representing Hurst, said that he was unable to comment on the legal case at this time because he is still seeking information gathered by law enforcement.
Hurst is working out of town and has not been served with notice of the attempt to seize the property, Kunes said. He likely will request a hearing on the civil motion.
“I can assure you he’ll be filing a request for that,” he said. “I haven’t seen that complaint yet.”
Hurst will have 30 days from the date he is served notice to give an answer to the complaint, Kunes said.
Any property seized would go the agency that made the legal case, he said. In a drug case, for instance, a car used in the crime can be seized and sold or put into use by the agency.
The other 29 men and two women charged with parties to animal cruelty in the case are scheduled for trial on Monday.
http://moultrieobserver.com/x1555256908/DA-seeks-seizure-of-land
Monday, July 2, 2012
How does Medical Marijuana affect standards used to check impairment of DUI drivers?
Let’s start by stating that driving
while impaired by drugs or alcohol is a crime and must be punished. All 50 U.S.
states have clear laws prohibiting this activity. But there is one intoxicant that is
trickier than the others: marijuana, especially when used for medical purposes.
During the past two years, Colorado
and Montana, along with more than a dozen other states, have proposed laws that set a strict
threshold for determining when a marijuana user is deemed too impaired to
drive. These would consider a concentration of more than 5 nanograms of
tetrahydrocannabinol, or THC (the psychoactive component of marijuana) per
milliliter of blood, as hands-down proof of intoxication or impairment.
Several states are going further and
have either adopted or are considering zero-tolerance laws
for THC levels. This means any THC in the blood would result in a conviction. Here’s the problem with these laws:
There are questions about how, and at what level, cannabis use impairs driving
ability. For a patient in one of the 17 states where marijuana has been
legalized for medicinal use, how are you to know when it’s legal to drive?
After consuming marijuana, should you wait 12 hours to drive or one day? When
will your THC level be below the 5-nanogram threshold? The answer is
complicated.
Although marijuana is readily
detectable in toxicology tests of blood, hair,
urine or saliva, what isn’t clear is just how quickly THC passes through the
body. We know, for example, that THC may be detected in the blood of occasional
users several hours after ingesting. But in some chronic users there may be
traces for days after the last use, long after any performance-impairing
effects have subsided.
This is a very clear contrast with
alcohol. There is a firm understanding of the rate at which the body metabolizes alcohol
and there are well-known guidelines on how much time must pass after drinking
before one is fit to drive. Tests can easily be administered in roadside stops.
Those who fail simple benchmarks of sobriety -- not to mention breath tests --
are usually convicted or plead guilty.
The research on how marijuana
affects driving is far less conclusive, though.
Testing done on drivers under the
influence of alcohol often show that drivers display more aggressive behavior
behind the wheel, and errors are more pronounced than when sober. The opposite
tends to be true when drivers are under the influence of THC; they tend to have
heightened awareness -- rather than diminished sensitivity as they do after
drinking -- to their surroundings. As a result, they tend to compensate by
driving more cautiously.
What this means is that we need more
research before new DUI marijuana laws are enacted. Setting an absolute
impairment standard for THC bloodstream levels is premature. And these laws,
which target marijuana use and associated medical marijuana patients, are
discriminatory.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-07-01/marijuana-as-medicine-needs-rules-to-drive-by.html
Wednesday, June 13, 2012
Failed tests stop GBI from doing handwriting analysis
The Georgia State Crime Lab has stopped providing
handwriting comparison analysis for criminal cases until the scientists in that
unit pass an assessment required by a national accrediting agency.
The Georgia Bureau of Investigation -- which oversees the lab -- told
prosecutors and law enforcement agencies throughout the state that the American
Society of Crime Laboratory Directors had determined that GBI scientists who do
handwriting comparisons did not meet the "requirements for our quality
system." There are two questions on the handwriting assessment. All
three scientists missed one of the questions -- the same one, according to GBI
spokesman John Bankhead.The scientists will undergo more training and retake the test, GBI Director Vernon Keenan said Monday.
Handwriting analysis has dwindled in importance to prosecutors over the years. Tests for DNA and firearms matching and drug and alcohol screenings are far more critical to criminal prosecutions. Handwriting analysis is most often useful in forgery cases.
Accreditation of the lab is not required but enhances the credibility of the testimony of any scientists who do the analysis, according to Bankhead and John Neuner, accreditation program manager with the American Society of Crime Laboratory Directors.
But Neuner said many labs nationwide are putting fewer resources into handwriting analysis.
"It's dying across the country," Neuner said. "I think the reason it's dying is a matter of resources. There just isn't as much demand in an electronic world. It's dying just because laboratories can better utilize their [staff and financial] resources for other things. The FBI has historically provided services that are specialized that the local labs cannot support. The FBI still has that service if and when it's needed."
http://www.ajc.com/news/failed-tests-stop-gbi-1456357.html
Thursday, May 31, 2012
Dawsonville man sentenced in 2010 vehicular homicide
DAWSONVILLE - The Dawson County man convicted earlier
this year in the vehicular homicide death of a Gainesville woman has now been
sentenced in the case.
The accident happened on June 25, 2010 on Georgia 400. Authorities say Jenna Annette Fitzgerald, 24, fell from a Jeep onto the highway and was struck and killed by another vehicle.
The man driving the Jeep, Colon Loius Hartzler, 45, of Dawsonville, was given a 10-year prison sentence on May 18. Northeastern Judicial Circuit District Attorney Lee Darragh said Hartzler will spend four years in prison and serve the remainder of the sentence on probation on the vehicular homicide conviction.
"He was also convicted of the offense of DUI, which was related to it [the accident], and that count merged into the homicide by vehicle count," said Darragh.
Darragh said Hartzler also was fined $3,000, and he was ordered to perform 240 hours in community service time.
http://www.accessnorthga.com/detail.php?n=249148
The accident happened on June 25, 2010 on Georgia 400. Authorities say Jenna Annette Fitzgerald, 24, fell from a Jeep onto the highway and was struck and killed by another vehicle.
The man driving the Jeep, Colon Loius Hartzler, 45, of Dawsonville, was given a 10-year prison sentence on May 18. Northeastern Judicial Circuit District Attorney Lee Darragh said Hartzler will spend four years in prison and serve the remainder of the sentence on probation on the vehicular homicide conviction.
"He was also convicted of the offense of DUI, which was related to it [the accident], and that count merged into the homicide by vehicle count," said Darragh.
Darragh said Hartzler also was fined $3,000, and he was ordered to perform 240 hours in community service time.
http://www.accessnorthga.com/detail.php?n=249148
Friday, April 13, 2012
Former Dekalb County Prosecutor arrested for DUI refusal "Less Safe"
Attorney Jennifer Little, recently hired by the widow of Dunwoody day care shooting victim Rusty Sneiderman, was arrested early Thursday morning and charged with suspected DUI, speeding and reckless driving.
Little was traveling northbound on I-85 near Buford Highway around 12:30 a.m. when she was stopped by Atlanta police, who clocked her at 91 mph -- 36 mph over the speed limit.
The former DeKalb County prosecutor refused field and chemical sobriety tests, according to an APD spokesman, resulting in a charge of DUI Less Safe. That charge requires the arresting officer to testify he or she noticed unsafe driving patterns that would signal impairment due to alcohol or drug use.
APD spokesman Curtis Davenport said Little presented an expired DeKalb DA’s identification card at the time of stop, saying she had just left the office two months ago.
Little, 33, and law partner Doug Chalmers were hired by Andrea Sneiderman in mid-March during the trial of her former boss, Hemy Neuman, who was sentenced to life in prison for killing the Dunwoody woman's husband.
Sneiderman may soon face criminal charges herself. A DeKalb County grand jury has subpoenaed Channel 2 Action News for the entirety of her testimony given during the Neuman trial. DeKalb D.A. Robert James told the Atlanta Journal-Constitution he believes Sneiderman was involved in her husband's death.
Chalmers declined comment Thursday when reached by the AJC.
Little, former president of the DeKalb Bar Association, posted bond and was released early Thursday morning.
The arrest is not expected to affect her standing in the Georgia Bar Association. According to the bar's ethics counsel, Bill Smith, attorneys are typically not sanctioned for misdemeanor DUI charges.
http://www.ajc.com/news/atlanta/andrea-sneiderman-attorney-arrested-1414967.html
Little was traveling northbound on I-85 near Buford Highway around 12:30 a.m. when she was stopped by Atlanta police, who clocked her at 91 mph -- 36 mph over the speed limit.
The former DeKalb County prosecutor refused field and chemical sobriety tests, according to an APD spokesman, resulting in a charge of DUI Less Safe. That charge requires the arresting officer to testify he or she noticed unsafe driving patterns that would signal impairment due to alcohol or drug use.
APD spokesman Curtis Davenport said Little presented an expired DeKalb DA’s identification card at the time of stop, saying she had just left the office two months ago.
Little, 33, and law partner Doug Chalmers were hired by Andrea Sneiderman in mid-March during the trial of her former boss, Hemy Neuman, who was sentenced to life in prison for killing the Dunwoody woman's husband.
Sneiderman may soon face criminal charges herself. A DeKalb County grand jury has subpoenaed Channel 2 Action News for the entirety of her testimony given during the Neuman trial. DeKalb D.A. Robert James told the Atlanta Journal-Constitution he believes Sneiderman was involved in her husband's death.
Chalmers declined comment Thursday when reached by the AJC.
Little, former president of the DeKalb Bar Association, posted bond and was released early Thursday morning.
The arrest is not expected to affect her standing in the Georgia Bar Association. According to the bar's ethics counsel, Bill Smith, attorneys are typically not sanctioned for misdemeanor DUI charges.
http://www.ajc.com/news/atlanta/andrea-sneiderman-attorney-arrested-1414967.html
Tuesday, April 3, 2012
Braves Reliever arrested for DUI in Gwinnett County
Cristhian Martinez was arrested early Monday morning in Gwinnett County on charges of DUI, after allegedly weaving in and out of a lane and traveling at a low speed on I-85. Martinez was pulled over at 2:42 a.m. on I-85 North at Steve Reynolds Boulevard for failure to maintain a single lane by a Gwinnett County police officer who clocked Martinez traveling 40 mph. The officer smelled alcohol on Martinez’s breath, Smith said, and put him through a field sobriety test. Martinez’s blood alcohol registered .13 in a breathalyzer administered at the Gwinnett County jail, Smith said. The legal limit in Georgia is .08.
Martinez has secured a spot in the Braves bullpen this spring after going 0-0 with a 1.38 ERA in eight appearances, allowing two runs in 13 innings, with three walks, 13 strikeouts and a .159 opponents’ batting average.
http://blogs.ajc.com/atlanta-braves-blog/2012/04/02/braves-reliever-martinez-arrested-for-dui/
Martinez has secured a spot in the Braves bullpen this spring after going 0-0 with a 1.38 ERA in eight appearances, allowing two runs in 13 innings, with three walks, 13 strikeouts and a .159 opponents’ batting average.
http://blogs.ajc.com/atlanta-braves-blog/2012/04/02/braves-reliever-martinez-arrested-for-dui/
Thursday, February 16, 2012
Student sues Clayton County School District over strip search looking for marijuana
D.H. was in the seventh grade when he was made to strip down naked in front of three other students because another student alleged he had marijuana. School officials continued the search even after the other student admitted he had been lying. D.H. claims he still suffers from emotional distress because his classmates taunted him by calling him Superman, the underwear he was wearing when he was strip-searched. The student is suing the Clayton County school district for unspecified punitive and compensatory damages.
http://www.lsureveille.com/news/student-sues-ga-school-district-over-marijuana-strip-search-1.2701710
http://www.lsureveille.com/news/student-sues-ga-school-district-over-marijuana-strip-search-1.2701710
Friday, February 10, 2012
DUI dropped after Deputy falsified Documents
Roderick Tolberts' DUI charge in Augusta Georgia from March 24, 2011 was dropped because Richmond County Sherrif's Deputy Erik Norman was caught altering the breath test results from prior DUI cases. Norman resigned in October 2011. District Attorney Ashley Wright estimates that their office still has about a dozen of Norman's DUI cases pending.
http://chronicle.augusta.com/news/crime-courts/2012-02-10/dui-dropped-after-deputy-falsified-documents?v=1328876921
http://chronicle.augusta.com/news/crime-courts/2012-02-10/dui-dropped-after-deputy-falsified-documents?v=1328876921
Friday, February 3, 2012
Georgia Governor Nathan Deal to appear on DUI commercial during Superbowl
Governor Nathan Deal will appear on a commercial during the Superbowl. The "60 - second ad urges Georgia motorists to get a ride home if they've had too much alcohol on Super Sunday. Of course, there's an App for that. It's call Drive Sober Georgia, and it lists phone numbers for programs that drive tipsy motorists home for free."
http://www.politifact.com/georgia/statements/2012/feb/03/nathan-deal/deal-dui-super-bowl-ad-cites-good-statistic/
http://www.gahighwaysafety.org/drivesobergeorgia/
http://www.politifact.com/georgia/statements/2012/feb/03/nathan-deal/deal-dui-super-bowl-ad-cites-good-statistic/
http://www.gahighwaysafety.org/drivesobergeorgia/
Wednesday, January 25, 2012
DUI record could be erased under proposed Georgia Law
Rep. Rusty Kidd from Milledgeville has proposed House Bill 799 which would erase a DUI conviction from a person's record after having a clean record for 5 years. Current DUI law has 5 and 10 year lookback periods which increase penalties for repeat offenders.
http://www.ajc.com/news/georgia-government/dui-record-could-be-1316786.html
http://www.ajc.com/news/georgia-government/dui-record-could-be-1316786.html
Tuesday, November 1, 2011
Will a Georgia DUI automatically suspend my driver's license?
If you are arrested for DUI and you blow over the legal limit or refuse to provide a sample for the state blood, breath, or urine test your license will be suspended on the 31st day after your arrest. The arresting officer is supposed to take your license and turn in a Department of Public Safety (DPS) Form 1205 to start the suspension. If you hold an out of state license Georgia can't suspend your license, but it can suspend your privilege to drive in Georgia. This action will be reported to your home state, and they may suspend your license through reciprocity if they are members of the Drivers License Compact or Nonresident Violator Compact.
However, you have the right to request an Administrative License Suspension (ALS) Hearing before the State takes your right to drive away. You must send a written request along with a $150 filing fee to the Department of Driver Services within 10 business days. You will then be scheduled for a hearing before an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) that will occur before any criminal hearings on the underlying DUI charge.
If the officer fails to show the ALJ will rescind the suspension and you will keep your license pending the outcome of the criminal case. If the officer does show, you will likely lose the hearing unless there was no legitimate reason for the original detention, no probable cause to arrest, the Georgia Implied Consent notice was improperly read, or there was no over the limit BAC test or refusal. Even if you lose the ALS hearing, your attorney will have gotten an invaluable opportunity to get sworn testimony from the arresting officer before any criminal hearing occurs.
This administrative suspension will be lifted if you are found not guilty on the DUI charge, or if you get the charge reduced to reckless driving, public intoxication, or any other non-DUI disposition. Hiring an attorney who specializes in DUI cases will give you the best chance at prevailing on the criminal charges.
Be wary of an attorney who advises you to plead guilty to the DUI in order to have the officer rescind the ALS suspension. While it may save your license for a moment, once you plead guilty to DUI, you will lose your license for a minimum of 6-12 months. While the ALS suspension would be a 12 months if you refused the State's test (with no limited permit for school or work), there may be defenses available that would lift that suspension completely upon getting the case thrown out, or getting a reduction. Make sure you hire a knowledgeable attorney who is known as a fighter, and not a "plea attorney."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)